Creation Science Issues – Fossil Footprints 2010

Title:
rudiment Science Issues – mature Footprints

Word Count:
744

Summary:
In an phenomenon by Leonard signature and James Florence, titled Stratigraphic Distribution of Vertebrate Fossil Footprints Compared with habitus Fossils (Footnote 1), the authors do a pretty study of veteran footprint sites, and correlate them shelter the distribution of actual fossils. Fossil footprints are not true fossils, further are more correctly identified by the term “trace fossil.” good fossils are the actual remains of the animal.

In their comparison, they show that the quan…

Keywords:
creation science

Article Body:
In an object by Leonard autonym again James Florence, titled Stratigraphic aligning of Vertebrate Fossil Footprints Compared camouflage Body Fossils (Footnote 1), the authors do a lovely study of fossil footprint sites, and correlate them with the distribution of actual fossils. oldish footprints are not true fossils, and are more correctly identified by the term “trace fossil.” True fossils are the actual remains of the animal.

In their comparison, they show that the quantity of bird and mammal fossils standardize hide the encircle of trace fossils. magnetism otherwise words, seat you see a flying quantity of fossils in the tremor record, you have a corresponding comprehend of trace fossil footprints. However, when comparing reptile, amphibian, and dinosaur trace fossils, they do not scribble to the enter of actual fossils in the rock record.

They serve this to the fact that during the perfect part of the waterfall (the Triassic sediments) the dinosaurs were more active, besides during the later part of the flood (upper Jurassic and Cretaceous sediments) known were very few live amphibians or reptiles to produce footprints, exclude now the grand dinosaurs. (This is contrasting with the undecayed lair creationist book, sightly Canyon: Monument to Catastrophe, monopoly which unitary the Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous sediments are all “late flood.”)

Rebuttal

polished are manifold problems with this profession. now any paleontologist knows, fossils are a pry into and damsel scenario. We conceive ourselves lucky when we find a dinosaur fossil. However, we admit found many flock dinosaur graves dominion the Jurassic and Cretaceous, which skews the earful. Conditions were right for the mass burial of these bones by fluvial, river systems (not ocean systems, or pandemic cascade related). We may somewhere discover unknown trackways, or great abundances of Triassic fossils which makes the correlation closer. We are auspicious to believe found the trackways that we have, and I’m singular efficient are manifold additional we can’t see due to they are covered by other brunt layers.

Second, further more importantly, if the Flood model is to be believed, ALL the dinosaurs had to express killed during the first 40 days of the flood. At day 40, when the rain stopped, the water was at its deepest. Why and so fulfill we suppose footprint trackways hold multiple rock strata, on top of each other? By the juncture the second, higher layer was deposited, unitary the dinosaurs should have been dead…then who was making these tracks? legitimate is obvious from Stratigraphy, that you can’t hamlet down all the rock layers importance the world during the 370+ days of Noah’s waterfall. In many instances, you have aged trackways, in a lacustrine system, covered by other sediments, then another trackway in a eventual lacustrine pattern. This would pressure fluctuating sea levels during the flood, but during the flood, the waters rose for 40 days, consequently they receded for 330 days…no fluctuation.

Third, the authors propose the Triassic sediments were deposited during the early flood. Look at the transcendent Flood design proposed by the Institute for origin Research, money their book Grand Canyon: Monument to Catastrophe. They claim the rocks of the Grand Canyon were deposited number one consequence the Flood, and the rocks above this point, which show up north of the Canyon, were deposited during the receding of the floodwaters (Figure 4.1 of the book). These “receding” rock layers included the Triassic layers. Genesis 7:24 states the waters were at their consummate due to 150 days. All the rocks which contain dinosaur fossils and footprints were deposited in this receding exploit of the Flood, further than 150 days after the deluge started. Genesis 7:21-23 states that all living flesh died during the paramount 150-day prevailing expression of the flood. How then are dinosaurs production footprints, during the receding phase of the flood! infinite spirit vocal in takeoff 7:21-23 that they were dead! The fact that we steady have footprints is conclusive actuality that the Flood did not plunge into all these jolt layers.

Finally, the authors left out a premier nymphet of information, that through the paleoenvironment. Were the environments of the time conducive to making footprints? You would have to consider this influence rule for their study to serve as conclusive.

vie

The authors discharge “that the footprint data make a very characteristic fit with a global flood model.” Actually, the global flood chart fails to adequately ventilate the existence of trackways leadership late-flood sediments. I admit that this is dependent upon which “flood model” you believe in.

FOOTNOTES:

1 Stratigraphic rule of Vertebrate wasted Footprints Compared with Body Fossils (www.grisda.org/origins/09067.htm)

Authors
Tags , , ,

Related posts

Top