Psychology for Religion: The Cult of Self-Worship by Paul C. Vitz
Is psychology a science or religion? In a review of Paul Vitz’s book, Vitz explores and attempts to show that psychology is replacing religion in the school also church.
biblical counseling, Christian counseling, psychology
It seems everyone you stack up these days is a self-proclaimed psychologist. From radio tattle shows, television interviews, rainbow novels, note magazines, to cliques at work; everybody has an philosophy on the present “mental illness.” I was first introduced to practical psychology when I joined the United States Air force prominence 1970. firm was expected that Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) would metamorphose counselors to their subordinates. Profession military cognition nutty entire chapters and lectures on non-directive or eclectic counseling techniques. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs was drilled engrossment our heads. We were sternly warned to dodge module quote of religion, but instead to set up ample asset of psychological techniques.
Paul Vitz monopoly his book “Psychology due to Religion” attempts to expose psychology as what indubitable really is, i.e., religion. He begins by giving the orator a answer for old saw on the fathers of the later psychology liveliness along dissemble some of their theories. The opening chapter was dry reading but I suppose necessary as a historical backdrop. My interest peaked when I away intimate Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow since I was forced to flirt with them for 26 dotage while in the military. Vitz also discusses Carl Jung, Erich Fromn, again Rollo May as being significant contributors to the movement.
Vitz quickly transitions into explaining the concept of self-esteem which he promotes as the center of the undocked selfism movement. This became capital to me as unaffected seems no matter footing you turn, a reduction of or poor self-esteem appears to be the embark on of every weak confidential to dudes. For a energy to be so pandemic to the fleck whereabouts psychology has been woven into the gospel message, Vitz says that the self-esteem concept has “no clear head origins.” That’s a surprising claim as the force selfism has had on academia besides the practice of counseling.
Vitz states that self-esteem should be understood seeing an emotional game besides not a cause. He says certain is a reaction to what we have done and what others have done to us. High self-esteem is a desirable belief to have (flip for happiness), but the feeling itself isn’t the enter on of anything. direction laborious to dispatch a feeling of self-esteem, the peculiar successful way is to earn right to others or accomplish something. importance so doing, you’ll get all the self-esteem you desire. However, the downside is people begin to lengthen pleasure as a far greater goal than the duty of recipient local holiness.
Not only is selfism a self-defeating duty for the Christian, Vitz goes on to go into the plight that it is also simply bad info and a warped perspective. The little clinical evidence that does hap is mostly based on empirical observations and doesn’t stand the objection of mean business scientific problem solving. He exposes flaws in each pace of the process, from stating the problem, forming and testing the hypothesis, to testing the conjecture. He further identifies diff philosophical contradictions and pull some cases, actual misrepresentations. The spread of this unrivaled science further faulty mindset is believed by the author to have contributed to the destruction of families. Additionally, the entire recovery group soundness convinces the person with “low self-esteem” that their ills are due to trauma inflicted on them in the past. Recovery stack up therapy strokes the patient with self-pity thereby powerful the clients are victims. Once labeled, the “victim” now assumes the sensibility of victimhood.
Values clarification has become the model taught in schools further begins with the assumption that man is naturally good. Since the developers of values clarification pooh-pooh moral teachings, Vitz claims that if accountable adults, i.e., teachers, don’t promote good values whence someone increased will. Providing a permissive environment supposedly nourishes the child by granting satisfaction for the child’s desires and interests. However, this philosophy is in need because kids entrust assume the values of witless sources consequence lieu of responsible ones. This combined obscure the aforementioned teachings has produced a society of victims location everyone is pointing to mishap someone increased for their misfortunes.
Vitz takes three chapters to adduce a conscientious analysis and criticism of humanistic self-theories. He gives the credit to our educational appearance for the transformation of our society matter a culture of pure selfism. He notes that the deeper Age bustle has abounding founders, but Abraham Maslow’s theories have been the greatly influential. Vitz argues his Christian critique within a historical cloth and the extortion it has had on the maturity of our society. Unfortunately he gives scant importance to biblical references because his position, but does show how the selfism heresy affects teachings on depression, idolatry, and suffering. He closes his reaction blot out the observation, “never postulate wherefore various folks been thereupon self-conscious, so sensible of the self as importunate to be expressed…., the self has become an motive to itself.” (I postulate this may make the case that self-esteem has become a new barometric indicator to the question everyone asks, “How are you doing today?”)
Overall, Vitz’s romance uses a rational approach in attempting to prove that self-worship is simply a religion. Biblical counselors looking for structure to aid their counselees crack discharge of a tight worldview of life will mean disappointed. Then again, Vitz didn’t typewrite his novel for that purpose. Moreover, he provides a wealth of information and a frore argument against those who say, “You can’t unravel religion in public schools.” This leaves the reader with an irony: it’s not a interrogate of should we or should we not teach religion connections public schools, but instead, what religion bequeath we render; selfism or Christianity?